| A |
Course dynamics |
|
|
6 |
| A1 |
|
attendance |
You attended and actively took part in all sessions. |
3 |
| A2 |
|
resources shared and contributions |
You shared at least 3 resources for each session. |
3 |
| B |
Individual case study |
|
|
14 |
| B1 |
→ content |
|
|
9 |
| B1a |
|
depth of the analysis |
Your case study reflects a deep understanding and a mature analysis of the topic. |
1 |
| B1b |
|
critical thinking |
Your content shows your ability to be a critical thinker who knows how to be nuanced and bring valid arguments. |
1 |
| B1c |
|
richness of the content |
Your case study covers various aspects of the topic, nothing is left behind or the limitations are well explained. |
2 |
| B1d |
|
structuration of the content |
Your project is clearly organized for easy reading / viewing / using / listening. |
2 |
| B1e |
|
conceptual clarity |
All concepts addressed through the project are clearly presented. |
1 |
| B1f |
|
collection and use of original or relevant data |
You gathered relevant data to address your topic. |
1 |
| B1g |
|
quality of the bibliography |
You gathered relevant knowledge to address your topic. |
1 |
| B2 |
→ format |
|
|
5 |
| B2a |
|
rigorous presentation of ideas |
Your ideas are clearly presented, you use the right words in the right context and in the right order. |
1 |
| B2b |
|
style |
Your writing is clear, precise, concise, and makes your content understandable. |
1 |
| B2c |
|
formatting rules (text, citations, bibliography…) |
Your content respects the usual academic formatting rules. |
1 |
| B2d |
|
spelling, syntax, writing quality |
Your content does not contain any spelling or grammatical errors. |
1 |
| B2e |
|
format relevance |
The format chosen is relevant to the content of the project. |
1 |
| TOTAL |
|
|
|
20 |